Skip to content

2020–2021 / Theatre, rehearsal and documentation

The Rooftop Howler

From recruitment and rehearsal to performance: tracing how shared work takes form.

Documentation of The Rooftop Howler
Documentation of The Rooftop Howler.

HE FA’S ROLE

P4 organizing and 3P documentation

Complete chapter contents
Year
2020–2021
Medium
Live theatre, rehearsal and moving-image record
Role
P4 organisation / 3P live documentation

The project moved through casting and rehearsal in 2020 and was performed at P4 at 19:30 on 2 January 2021.

04

Project statement

Howlers on the Rooftop was developed through P4U, leaving open calls, rehearsal materials, participant texts, a public performance and later conversations. The performance took place at P4 at 19:30 on 2 January 2021.

Alongside his organisational work through P4, He Fa joined Zhang Shaohua and Huang Lucang in the 3P group’s live documentation.

A line through the work

When personal experience is rehearsed and heard by others, how does it become a public situation?

The theatre manager within the script

Page 9 of the retained Rooftop Howler script PDF names “He Fa” among the characters in Act Four, with that character responding to an interruption as the theatre manager. This is a role within the script: the document alone does not establish that He Fa performed in a particular show or wrote the script, and its fictional events should not be treated as real incidents. The filename’s designation “final playwright’s version” is a version label and does not establish that this text was used in a public performance.

Archival document supplement. Source: the retained PDF titled The Rooftop Howler (final playwright’s version), p. 9; title translated. The date of completion and playwright credit have not been verified. English is an editorial translation.

CLOSE READING / 2026 CURATORIAL INTERPRETATION

The Rooftop Howler

Does participating in a work mean agreeing with it?

Work date: 2020–2021Reading: 2026

Site editorial reading · AI-assisted · Version 2026-09-16

A character who keeps howling makes the fictional city ask what his voice means. Discussion around the production returns that question to its making: who can speak, whose views alter the structure, and who stays chiefly to complete the performance? The published interviews are valuable because they do not polish every experience into the same story of growth. Some value the company more than the script; others leave more certain that they want a different kind of theatre.

These disagreements are not decorative signs of authenticity. They test what openness actually enabled. Giving them a central place allows source material to resist the portfolio’s positive account. Yet one participant’s allegation about another person should not become an adjudicated fact. The accurate form retains who said what, when, and leaves room for further responses. Documentation gains value here by letting a work remain open to judgment after its performance ends.

The limits of this reading

Criticism in the interview is an attributed account, not a factual ruling by this site. Characters are not equated with their performers.

Sources for this reading

Based on performance records and the first Howler backstage interview, published 28 March 2021. Interviewees’ views retain their attribution.

Work record

The Rooftop Howler, 2020–2021. Theatre, rehearsal and documentation. He Fa’s role: P4 organizing and 3P documentation.

Work / series
The Rooftop Howler
Date
2020–2021
Medium
Theatre, rehearsal and documentation
He Fa’s role
P4 organizing and 3P documentation
Catalogue section
Collaborative practice

Cite this record: The Rooftop Howler · 2020–2021 · P4 organizing and 3P documentation · https://hefa.p4theater.cn/en/work/rooftop-howler

TAKE A PATH ACROSS

Other paths from this work.

  1. A seated group with the overlaid title Messages from the Deliberation Panel

    Working together

    Where disagreement can appear

    The Rooftop HowlerFinal Solution

    Rooftop Howler preserves recruitment, rehearsals, performance and later conversations; Final Solution preserves questioning, voting and reflection. Both leave an event available for return viewing, while collective rehearsal and decisions about character removal use different forms of organization.

    2020–2021 / Theatre, rehearsal and documentation
    2021 / Participatory theatre, a deliberation game and process documentation

    Read the source materials
    1. Event recordProject statement ↗

      The project account records recruitment, rehearsals, performance and later conversations, together with on-site 3P documentation by He Fa, Zhang Shaohua and Huang Lucang.

    2. Period documentGiving the assembly the decision ↗

      The May 2021 call and He Fa’s July account document questioning, voting, character departure and transcription with reflection; version differences remain explicit.

    Continue from this work ↗

2026-10-04 / ARCHIVAL ADDITION

Source materials, process and versions

Recruitment graphics name 2 January 2021 as a planned date. They remain separate from the first-rehearsal recordings and do not establish that the advertised event occurred as planned.

嚎叫者动图1.jpg
嚎叫者动图1.jpg · Web access copy from the preserved source

嚎叫者动图1.jpg ↗

嚎叫者动图2.jpg
嚎叫者动图2.jpg · Web access copy from the preserved source

嚎叫者动图2.jpg ↗

DJI_0033.MP4 ↗

DJI_0077.MP4 ↗

Follow the other material strands ↗

FROM HERE, ELSEWHERE

Passages between works

Related records in the archive

Other works & reading