Skip to content

2021–2022 / Intimate live theatre

Iceberg

A small office and fifteen spectators: spatial proximity becomes part of the work.

Documentation of Iceberg
Iceberg documentation, P4 Theater.

HE FA’S ROLE

Producer

Complete chapter contents
Year
2021–2022
Medium
Live theatre, spatial installation and collective creation
Role
Producer

Eight makers and fifteen spectators entered the same small office; Iceberg was performed at 19:30 on 1 January 2022.

03

Project statement

Iceberg was developed by eight makers and opened to an audience of fifteen inside a small office. Crowding, obstruction, silence and the difficulty of entering or leaving directly changed how the event could be seen.

The performance took place at 19:30 on 1 January 2022. Makers and spectators shared the same room without the stable distance of a proscenium stage.

A line through the work

When spectators cannot retreat to a distance, what kind of bodily relation does looking become?

Two venue disruptions before Iceberg took shape

On December 7, 2021, He Fa described meeting Qu Wenhao, planning a production and forming a group again. After the Diaosutai venue stopped opening in June, a proposed ninth production initiated by Qu was halted. They began recruiting in a Wangjing office to develop Qu’s Iceberg. He Fa delegated most organizing work to Qu while occupied elsewhere; another venue problem arose in September. Iceberg’s development thus involved repeated changes of space, people and organization.

When restarting, the two decided to discuss shared values before forming North Wind Theatre. The article explicitly credits Qu with writing the nine-point declaration; He Fa endorsed it and joined the invitation. Its principles include respecting an initiator’s impulse, bringing personal concerns into roles, expressing views openly and addressing disagreement. The record therefore retains Qu’s authorship of the declaration and their joint initiation of the company.

Related sources

CLOSE READING / 2026 CURATORIAL INTERPRETATION

Iceberg

What does viewing become when there is no distant position?

Work date: 2021–2022Reading: 2026

Site editorial reading · AI-assisted · Version 2026-09-16

The space gives no one a frontal position from which everything can be safely surveyed. Another body blocks the view, and one’s own movement changes a neighbour’s sightline. Silence, crowding and difficulty moving become concrete materials. The intensity cannot be reproduced simply by enlarging a video. It comes from the bodily cost of looking in limited space and from the impossibility of imagining the spectator as an eye that leaves the event untouched.

Yet physical closeness proves neither a deep relation nor equal willingness to participate. Spatial facts should coexist with differing audience accounts rather than translating every discomfort into proof of artistic success. He Fa’s production role deserves a concrete description of how venue, schedule, light and documentation enabled collective work. The site can begin with the identifiable office and viewing positions, then let footage and criticism open that small space further.

The limits of this reading

Still photographs and plans do not reproduce the live experience. The producer credit is not rewritten as sole director.

Sources for this reading

Based on performance records, the public work page and its linked North Wind Theatre archive.

Continue in writing

Follow works back to signed texts, with writing at the time, later reflection and participant accounts identified separately.

Work record

Iceberg, 2021–2022. Intimate live theatre. He Fa’s role: Producer.

Work / series
Iceberg
Date
2021–2022
Medium
Intimate live theatre
He Fa’s role
Producer
Catalogue section
Collaborative practice

TAKE A PATH ACROSS

Other paths from this work.

  1. Illusion: a bodily gesture photographed against a white background

    Spaces transformed

    Between blankness and crowding

    IcebergIllusion

    Illusion separates poses from a setting through a white background; Iceberg places performers and spectators in a small office. Spatial cues recede in one, while obstruction and proximity become unavoidable conditions in the other.

    2021–2022 / Intimate live theatre
    2011 / Photography, light box

    Read the source materials
    1. Work imageImages and presentation ↗

      The body in the first portfolio image is set against white, with no support visible; the photographs are not labelled as successive stages of motion.

    2. Event recordProject statement ↗

      The event record specifies 1 January 2022, an office, eight makers and fifteen audience members, including crowding and obstruction as conditions of viewing.

    Continue from this work ↗
  2. Four screens forming a square, with audience areas marked in pink and performance areas in green

    Spaces transformed

    Enclosure can be planned or constrained

    IcebergHamlet’s Mirror / Four-screen CAFAM Proposal

    The CAFAM four-screen proposal distinguishes audience and performance zones in drawings; Iceberg shares limited office space. Both arrange enclosure and spectatorship, but imagined zoning cannot stand in for actual obstruction.

    2021–2022 / Intimate live theatre
    2016 / Proposal for four-screen projection, live performance and real-time video · Proposals

    Read the source materials
    1. Period documentFrom one screen to four ↗

      The jointly signed proposal of 5 September 2016 surrounds the space with four screens and distinguishes audience and performance areas by colour; the evidence is a proposal and equipment arrangement.

    2. Event recordProject statement ↗

      The event record specifies 1 January 2022, an office, eight makers and fifteen audience members, including crowding and obstruction as conditions of viewing.

    Continue from this work ↗

2026-10-04 / ARCHIVAL ADDITION

Source materials, process and versions

Meetings, rehearsals, location work and edited films remain distinct. A meeting record can be read alongside the public poster without confusing production discussion with the finished film.

DJI_0015.JPG
DJI_0015.JPG · Web access copy from the preserved source

DJI_0015.JPG ↗

8f9fb16e200f98acf6f46a32fde1135.png
8f9fb16e200f98acf6f46a32fde1135.png · Web access copy from the preserved source

8f9fb16e200f98acf6f46a32fde1135.png ↗

DJI_0044.MP4 ↗

2022-01-01 19-26-48 NJZB 3840x2160 30fps.MOV ↗

Follow the other material strands ↗

FROM HERE, ELSEWHERE

Passages between works

Related records in the archive

Other works & reading